Thursday, November 25, 2010

Chalmers Johnson Dies at 79; Criticized U.S. Role in World

By DENNIS HEVESI
Chalmers Johnson, an Asian studies scholar who stirred controversy with books contending that the United States was trying to create a global empire and was paying a stiff price for it, died Saturday at his home in Cardiff-by-the Sea, Calif. He was 79.
The cause was complications of rheumatoid arthritis, his wife, Sheila, said.
Dr. Johnson, who considered himself a longtime cold warrior, was a consultant to the Central Intelligence Agency for many years. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union he became concerned that the United States was increasingly using its military presence to gain power over the global economy.
In “Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire” (Metropolitan Books, 2000), Dr. Johnson wondered why America’s military spending continued to rise after the cold war had ended. He concluded that through a network of more than 700 strategic bases around the world, the United States was committed to creating global hegemony. And he worried about the consequences for American democracy.
It was a theme he expanded upon in three subsequent books, “The Sorrows of Empire” (2004), “Nemesis” (2006) and “Dismantling the Empire” (2010).
Summarizing the series in “Dismantling the Empire,” Dr. Johnson said that “blowback” means more than a negative, sometimes violent reaction to United States policy. “It refers to retaliation for the numerous illegal operations we have carried out abroad that were kept totally secret from the American public,” he wrote.
“This means that when the retaliation comes, as it did so spectacularly on Sept. 11, 2001, the American public is unable to put the events in context. So they tend to support acts intended to lash out against the perpetrators, thereby most commonly preparing the ground for yet another cycle of blowback.”
To maintain its empire, he said, the United States “will inevitably undercut domestic democracy.”
In a review of “The Sorrows of Empire” in The New York Times, Ronald Asmus, a deputy assistant secretary of state under President Bill Clinton, wrote that the book was “a cry from the heart of an intelligent person who fears that the basic values of our republic are in danger.” He added that it “conveys a sense of impending doom rooted in a belief that the United States has entered a perpetual state of war that will drain our economy and destroy our constitutional freedoms.”
E. B. Keehn, past president of the Japan Society of Southern California and a former lecturer at Cambridge University, said in an interview on Monday that Dr. Johnson “did not go into his work with an agenda.”
“If the data pointed to a conclusion that made people uncomfortable, including himself,” Dr. Keehn said, “he would never shy away from it.”
That was true not only of the “blowback” series, Dr. Keehn said, but of Dr. Johnson’s studies of Chinese Communism and of the role Japan’s government played in its economy.
His 1982 book, “MITI and the Japanese Miracle” (MITI stands for the Ministry of International Trade and Industry), challenged conventional wisdom with its premise that Japan was a “capitalist developmental state” that combined government industrial strategy with free-market forces. His ideas contradicted those of economists who insisted that Japan’s economic rise was almost entirely based on the free market.
The heavily state-influenced economic model that Dr. Johnson elucidated can now be seen in South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and China. “This,” Dr. Keehn said, “is how you can have a contradiction that the world’s last remaining powerful Communist country is also the world’s greatest rising capitalist success.”
Born in Phoenix on Aug. 6, 1931, Chalmers Ashby Johnson was one of two children of Katherine and David Johnson Jr. After graduating from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1953, with a degree in economics, he served in the Navy in the Korean War; it was the start of his fascination with Asia. “His assault boat landing craft was constantly being repaired in Yokohama,” his wife said, “so he started to study Japanese.”
After receiving his master’s degree in 1957 and his doctorate in 1961, both from Berkeley, he joined the university’s political science faculty. He headed the China Center at Berkeley from 1967 to 1972 and was chairman of the political science department from 1976 to 1980. In 1988 he moved to the University of California, San Diego, to teach at its new School of International Relations and Pacific Studies. He retired in 1992.
Besides his wife, the former Sheila Knipscheer, he is survived by his sister, Barbara Johnson.



==
Chalmers Johnson: 10 Steps Toward Liquidating the Empire

Dismantling the American empire would, of course,
involve many steps. Here are ten key places to begin:
1. We need to put a halt to the serious environmental
damage done by our bases planet-wide. We also need to
stop writing SOFAs that exempt us from any
responsibility for cleaning up after ourselves.
2. Liquidating the empire will end the burden of
carrying our empire of bases and so of the "opportunity
costs" that go with them -- the things we might
otherwise do with our talents and resources but can't
or won't.
3. As we already know (but often forget), imperialism
breeds the use of torture. In the 1960s and 1970s we
helped overthrow the elected governments in Brazil and
Chile and underwrote regimes of torture that prefigured
our own treatment of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(See, for instance, A.J. Langguth, Hidden Terrors
[Pantheon, 1979], on how the U.S. spread torture
methods to Brazil and Uruguay.) Dismantling the empire
would potentially mean a real end to the modern
American record of using torture abroad.
4. We need to cut the ever-lengthening train of camp
followers, dependents, civilian employees of the
Department of Defense, and hucksters -- along with
their expensive medical facilities, housing
requirements, swimming pools, clubs, golf courses, and
so forth -- that follow our military enclaves around
the world.
5. We need to discredit the myth promoted by the
military-industrial complex that our military
establishment is valuable to us in terms of jobs,
scientific research, and defense. These alleged
advantages have long been discredited by serious
economic research. Ending empire would make this
happen.
6. As a self-respecting democratic nation, we need to
stop being the world's largest exporter of arms and
munitions and quit educating Third World militaries in
the techniques of torture, military coups, and service
as proxies for our imperialism. A prime candidate for
immediate closure is the so-called School of the
Americas, the U.S. Army's infamous military academy at
Fort Benning, Georgia, for Latin American military
officers. (See Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire
[Metropolitan Books, 2004], pp. 136-40.)
7. Given the growing constraints on the federal budget,
we should abolish the Reserve Officers' Training Corps
and other long-standing programs that promote
militarism in our schools.
8. We need to restore discipline and accountability in
our armed forces by radically scaling back our reliance
on civilian contractors, private military companies,
and agents working for the military outside the chain
of command and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
(See Jeremy Scahill, Blackwater:The Rise of the World's
Most Powerful Mercenary Army [Nation Books, 2007]).
Ending empire would make this possible.
9. We need to reduce, not increase, the size of our
standing army and deal much more effectively with the
wounds our soldiers receive and combat stress they
undergo.
10. To repeat the main message of this essay, we must
give up our inappropriate reliance on military force as
the chief means of attempting to achieve foreign policy
objectives.
Unfortunately, few empires of the past voluntarily gave
up their dominions in order to remain independent,
self-governing polities. The two most important recent
examples are the British and Soviet empires. If we do
not learn from their examples, our decline and fall is
foreordained.

Chalmers Johnson is the author of Blowback (2000), The
Sorrows of Empire (2004), and Nemesis: The Last Days of
the American Republic (2006), and editor of Okinawa:
Cold War Island (1999).

No comments:

Post a Comment